|
|
|
|
he basis for the today valid system of nomenclature is the
set up "Systema Naturae" by Carolus Linnaeus 1758.
In the 10th edition of this system Linnaeus (in fact Carl
of Linné) put in place the tiger described by it ones
feline carnivores into the kind Felis, and other. The kind
Felis was then the only kind for the big cats of prey. There
was no further subdivision on kind tier.
The first system of this kind in order to attempt to order
formally all ways of life homogeneously, made out Aristoteles
already four centuries before Christ birth on. This was the
first experiment of a such an intention. Although this system
showed still many engraving lacks, it served however as a
bearing for much other researcher and scholars, which Aristoteles
in his attempts would emulate and outdo would want.
Who searches for closer information about the systematical
arrangement of the tiger, that should see into the part of
taxonomy that was instead written specifically - taxonomy
of the tiger. Around to one must the division to be able
to understand over its construction summon know.
The division in the "Systema Naturae" occurs with
nine classical tiers. Those would be, from top to bottom sorted,
kingdom, tribe (lat. Phylum), sub-tribe (lat. sub-phylum),
class, arrangement (lat. Ordo), family (lat. Familia), gender
(lat. Genus), kind and race.
In the process of the following carrying
out, I will employ the German terms since the roman words
would be able to occasionally lead to confusion. The nine
tiers performed above are not to however be guaranteed scientifically
in a seen manner sufficiently, classification precise around
one. For this reason, be intermediate rides and boughs, over-
and employed sub-families. Numerical data are still contained
besides, which one the number one indicate be sub-tribe for
example and be noted down in the form "sub-tribe (2)".
|
|
|
By means of important qualities of the individual organisms,
one determines groups whose members matching features show
while they distinguish from other groups more strongly. In
the modern systematics, it is in particular valid to in such
a way separate kind groups that the division reflects developmental
processes those led to the origin of the individual ways of
life (kinds were only ordered to times Carl von Linnés
on the basis of external features to be recognized easily).
The groups form a kind pyramid or hierarchy whose individual
tiers correspond to the different degree of developmental
kinship. Several million kinds, that are at the lower end
of the hierarchy in each case from individual ones, near allied
living being may exist. The organism kingdoms which very many,
partial and only detailed allied kinds contain form the upper
end of the hierarchy.
In order to manage a system, the the circumstances in nature
so well how possible represents, examines and matches one
anatomy, physiology, genetics, behavior, ecology and fossil
finds of very many living beings. Kinds are confessed above
2,0 million today and partial ones at least described
but it is valid by far more to still detect it. All special
fields of biology add for these investigations. The disciplines
which are occupied immediately with questions of the arrangement
from kinds are called taxonomy and systematics. The two fields
overlap considerably but in taxonomy, it more is a question
of the designation (nomenclature) and the construction of
hierarchical systems while systematics is concerned earlier
with explanation of developmental kinship circumstances.
The lowest category of the hierarchy is
kind and she is also regarded as the only group which is available
in nature in actual fact. The higher categories represent
abstract kind groups. A kind exists from individuals those
resemble itself in many important qualities among one another
mate and produce fertile descendants provided that it is a
question of a species with sexual propagation. The crossroadses
with living beings of other kinds are not at all possible
either or the descendants resulting in this case are predominantly
infertile (bastards
& hybrids).
Kinds which do not cross themselves among one another whose
kinship is to however be recognized by features which were
undertaken by a common driving up form a kind. The individual
kinds of a kind bear a two-part name (twice-nomenklatur).
The first word is the name of the kind and the second - in
most cases a descriptive or geographic adjective - designates
the individual kind. This way of the designation was introduced
1758 also of the Swedish natural researcher Linné that
established the modern taxonomy as mentioned already. He employed
roman names because the scholars of its time notified themselves
in this language. Linné gave the generic term homo
(human being) and the kind denotation sapiens to the human
being (wisely ==> one might learn !!). One takes the kinds
to in total families, the families for arrangements, the arrangements
to classes, the classes to tribes and the tribes at the further
construction of the systematical hierarchy to organism empires.
One designates the organism groups within these seven main
tiers of the hierarchy as Taxa. The definition of a Taxons
includes the most important features which have Taxa contained
all in him together in each case.
To the further one can subdivision the individual tiers with
additions over- or under- provided. In addition, there are
still interstages in complicated systems as the cohorte (between
class and arrangement) and the Tribus (between family and
kind).
|
|
|
|
|
On the highest and therefore most general
tier, one subdivides all living beings those exist on earth
and also that on earth existed may have on (if wanted), to
five organism empires a. All ways of life known us, regardless
whether animal, plant or other one, rich men are to be found
in these and it is possible for every kind detected again
here to integrate - up to now.
Two kingdoms of living beings, the Plantae (plants) and the
Animalia (animals) recognized Aristoteles take in the 4 .
centuries A.C., when he set up the first biological system.
Plants rooted firmly in the ground distinguish from the in
most cases mobile animals which eat their food in way of life
and evolution so strongly that this introduction of the two
rich men was maintained before not far too long time. Only
in the 19 . centuries, when one knew for a long time
that protozoa can not be put into these two categories without
further ado, the thought arose, for the monocellular living
being a third for empire create; one mentioned it Protista.
And although one knew and knew photosynthesis in addition
already, that she is the most important means of the plants
for nutrient production, further, assigned to sesshaften one
the mushrooms those feed themselves by absorption of nutrients
to way of life because of you to the plants. We know today
that the mushrooms not count to the plants, but to settle
at an own kingdom.
After there were means however better and
better at youngest time for investigation of the cells, it
turned out increasingly more clearly be that the most important
dividing line does not run in the world of the alive one between
plants and animals, may quarantine between living beings,
whose a separated cell nucleus having cells and that, with
which a such membran covered heart is. The seedless cells
are called Prokaryonten ( before the centre"),
and the Eukaryonten hot such ones with a cell nucleus (
genuine heart"). Prokaryontenzellen also have no organ
ells (Mitochondrien, chloroplasts, sophisticated flag ells
and other at least specialized cell structure), of which some
into every Eukaryontenzellen occur. The bacteria and the Cyanobakterien
whom one puts to an own empire therefore in the modern taxonomy
with denotation Monera or Prokaryotae appertain to the Prokaryonten.
The Eukaryontenzellen arose between Prokaryonten much later
than a symbiotic combination. The empire of the Protista contains
a great variety of protozoa of which some exist alone, form
lastingly other colonies. All living beings at the empires
of the multicellular animals followed probably from Protisten.
The animal empire (Animalia) consists of many-cells organisms
whose cells are differentiated in different tissues; in addition,
animals are whole or in part mobile with the aid of contraction
capable tissues and they digest her food in the body interior.
The many-cells living beings of the planting empire normally
have cells with a cell wall. Chloroplasts in which they produce
their own nutrients through photosynthesis are in the cells.
To the fifth empire, the mushrooms (Fungi), may appertain
also many-cells kinds those however digest her food outside
of the body and then include it through hyphas; the hyphas
of which their whole body consists are protoplasm hoses.
Therefore, this division of the living beings into five empires
is based on three hierarchical levels: The first one is the
the Prokaryonts built simply very, the monocellular Eukaryonts
structured simply still quite appertain to the second and
the third is the tier of the complex ones, eukaryontic multicellular
animal. On the last-named tier, one can distinguish three
evolution directions which are characterized by three different
kinds of nutrition; this is reflected in the different tissue
organization of the animals, of the plants and of the mushrooms.
Since my pages are occupied with the tiger,
main interest is natural at the animal empire. The animal
kingdom establishes itself to something for 30 tribes who
are to be seen in the following table:
|
|
| tribe |
german name |
estimated kind number |
examples |
| Flagellata |
Geißeltierchen |
6 000 |
Trypanosoma brucei gambiense |
| Rhizopoda |
Wurzelfüßer |
11 000 |
Amoeba proteus |
| Sporozoa |
Sporentierchen |
- |
Plasmodium malariae |
| Cnidosporidia |
- |
- |
Myxosoma cerebralis |
| Ciliata |
Wimpertierchen |
5 500 |
Pantoffeltierchen (Paramecium caudatum) |
| Placozoa |
- |
2 |
Trichoplax adhaerens |
| Porifera |
Schwämme |
5 000 |
Geweihschwamm (Haliclona loosanoffi) |
| Cnidaria |
Nesseltiere |
10 000 |
Gelbe Feuerqualle (Cyanea capillata) |
| Ctenophora |
Rippenquallen |
80 |
Venusgürtel (Cestus veneris) |
| Mesozoa |
- |
50 |
Pseudicyema truncatum |
| Plathelminthes |
Plattwürmer |
13 000 |
Fuchsbandwurm (Echinococcus multilocularis) |
| Gnathostomulida |
Kiefermündchen |
100 |
Gnathostomula mediterranea |
| Nemertini |
Schnurwürmer |
800 |
Prostoma graecense |
| Nemathelminthes |
Rundwürmer |
12 000 |
Trichinella spiralis |
| Priapulida |
Rüsselwürmer |
8 |
Priapulus caudatus |
| Kamptozoa |
Kelchwürmer |
150 |
Loxosomella vivipara |
| Mollusca |
Weichtiere |
50 000 |
Gemeiner Krake (Octopus vulgaris) |
| Sipunculida |
Spritzwürmer |
200 |
Golfingia vulgaris |
| Echiurida |
Igelwürmer |
140 |
Echiurus echiurus |
| Annelida |
Ringelwürmer |
17 000 |
Regenwurm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
| Pogonophora |
Bartwürmer |
120 |
Siboglinum caulleryi |
| Onychophora |
Stummelfüßer |
100 |
Austroperipatus |
| Tardigrada |
Bärtierchen |
300 |
Echiniscus testudo |
| Pentastomida |
Zungenwürmer |
100 |
Nasenwurm (Linguatula serrata) |
| Arthropoda |
Gliederfüßer |
> 1 Millionen |
Küchenschabe (Blatta orientalis) |
| Tentaculata |
Kranzfühler |
4 300 |
Zungenmuschel (Lingula unguis) |
| Chaetognatha |
Pfeilwürmer |
70 |
Spadella cephaloptera |
| Echinodermata |
Stachelhäuter |
6 000 |
Essbarer Seeigel (Echinus esculentus) |
| Hemichordata |
Kragentiere |
80 |
Balanoglossus clavigerus |
| Chordata |
Chordatiere |
50 000 |
Laubfrosch (Hyla arborea) |
the about 30 tribes of the animal kingdom (Animalia)
|
|
|
|
For information
about taxonomy of the cats and of the tiger in the specific
one please, go you at the side tiger taxonomy. Should you still
have general questions for taxonomy, then please, write an email
to me: |
|
 |
 |
|
|